|
to GEOSC497B
Geophysics of Basin & Range Province
What's New!(Under construction)
Course Material Print(pdf format)
Meeting Time : 2:30 - 3:20 PM, MWF
Where : 6 Deike
Grading Policy
First and foremost in this course, I want everyone to have fun learning new
things about geology and geophysics and working in a spectacular field area.
Informality will be the usual operating principle although simple courtesy
will be appreciated by all. (We will be living together for a solid week in
occasional close confines.)
Course grade will be based on classroom presentations, classroom
participation and quality of contribution to the final field reports.
Classroom presentations include prepared presentation of selected geologic
and geophysical papers from the literature, presentations concerning the
operation of equipment and presentation of geophysical results at the end of
the course. For the first half of the course you will be required to read
assigned papers, prepare type-written abstracts of particular papers, distribute
these to the class, present the paper to the class outlining all important
assumptions and results, and lead the ensuing discussion. We will also be
spending more time this year getting prepared for the field by working in the
lab and carefully checking equipment.
Participation includes participation in discussions after oral presentations by
students and faculty and helpfulness in the field.
Field reports will be group efforts with clear statements within that indicate
individual contributions.
Experiments
We will be using several geophysical techniques to investigate the subsurface.
These include seismic refraction, gravity, and magnetics. In addition, we will
be using the TOPCON EDM Theodolite to accurately survey in station
locations and elevations. Last year we also attempted to install a passive
broadband seismic station on Eagle Mountain to investigate local
earthquakes. Pending the availability of seismic instruments in the
IRIS/PASSCAL instrument pool, we will try it again. (Last year's effort was
almost successful!)
Each of these of these items of equipment will be thoroughly checked and
calibrated by working groups prior to work in the field. Each one of you will
have the chance to operate and collect data from each instrument. Data
collection will truly be a joint effort by everyone in the class.
Last year's experiment concentrated on finding a geophysical signature of a
suspected lithological contrast across the Furnace Creek Fault Zone north of
Shoshone, California. As a class, we will look at the local geology of the area
and choose a suitable geophysical/geological target to go after.
Field Trips
Depending on the weather (which is almost always good) and problems that
we encounter in the field, we will be taking several geological field excursions
in Death Valley and the surrounding area to investigate spectacular fault
structures, desert geomorphology, and stratigraphy. We will make one or
more trips into the National Park as a group with one of the resident
geologists as well as going on several short hikes.
Living Arrangements
As in previous years, we will probably be staying at the Shoshone Education
and Research Center (SHEAR) administered by Terry Pavlis at the University
of Louisiana. This is a simple indoor facility that has all the amenities of
home. Students will pay for room, board and vehicle fuel while in
Shoshone. Last year this amounted to $144 for the entire trip. The
department picked up the costs for transportation to and from California in
past years and I expect the same thing to happen this year.
General:
What structures are we trying to image in our field area?
Are there other ways to collect the data to ensure a higher quality result?
What were goals of the scientific experiment as you saw them before starting?
Did these goals change? If so, why?
Surveying:
What is the accuracy of the final station locations?
What are the major sources of error?
What are the locations on the map?
How were the data reduced?
Gravity:
How does the gravity meter work?
How do you read it?
What is the result of comparing the data from the incorrect reading
procedure and the correct reading procedure? Was it systematic or
random? What were the errors.
What contributes most error to the reduced Bouguer gravity?
What are plausible geological models which explain the data?
How do you connect the gravity of this profile to the results of past
profiles in the area?
Is a topographic correction needed?
Magnetics:
How does the magnetometer work?
How do you read it?
Was a magnetic storm occurring on the days magnetic data were being
taken? How do you find out?
Were there significant anomalies?
What are plausible geological models which explain the data?
How do the models compare to past results.
Active Seismic:
What are layer velocities along the profile?
What kinds of materials do these velocities imply?
Were reflectors imaged?
What waves are contained in the raw data?
What processing techniques were used to reduce the data?
What is the profile geometry?
What is the depth of structure imaged by the experiment?
What does refraction analysis tell you?
What does reflection analysis tell you?
How can the experiment be repeated to yield better data?
What are plausible geological models which explain the data?
Passive Seismic:
What kind of events were recorded by the broadband station?
(local earthquakes, local industrial blasts, teleseismic earthquakes)
How many events were recorded?
What are the magnitudes of recorded events?
Is there local seismicity on nearby active faults?
Where are their locations? Can these events be correlated with data
collected by the Great Basin Network or Caltech's SCARLET
network?
Are there data available from the experiment to determined gross crustal
and mantle structure using:
receiver functions?
surface wave dispersion?
other observed phases?
Surveying
Compton, Robert S., Geology in the Field, John Wiley and Sons (1985)
Look at Chapter 8 to get an overview of surveying. Skim sections on
use of plane table and alidade equipment. Read section 8-7.
Gravity
Dobrin and Savit, Introduction to Geophysical Prospecting, 4th ed., 1988.
Chapter 12 - Skim theory, read sections about gravimeters
Chapter 13 - Read sections on gravity measurements on land,
reduction of gravity measurements, typical gravity anomalies for
various geological features
Chapter 14 - Section 14.5 on quantitative interpretation
Magnetics
Chapter 15
Chapter 16, Magnetic surveys on land
Skim Chapter 17
Seismic Reflection
An in-depth understanding of seismic techniques requires a good
mathematical background and familiarity with differential equations (the
wave equation) and Fourier transforms. Don't be too concerned with
understanding these aspects of theory but concentrate on the simple models
of wave propagation and configuration of the experiment.
Chapter 4, 7, 8
Text book by John Scales, Theory of seismic imaging. First 2 chapters.
Seismic Refraction
Chapter 11
If you have any comments, send me an email to "Seung Yoo".
|