![]() |
![]() |
Jennifer Nemitz PhD candidate in Geosciences 438 Deike Building, Penn State jaring@geosc.psu.edu |
| Portfolio Home | Sample Syllabus | Sample Lesson Plan | Sample Course Evaluation Plan | Power Point Presentations | Professional Development | Courses Taught | Teaching Resources |
(Note: The following hypothetical syllabus was created as a project for EM SC 602, a course in college teaching. The hypothetical syllabus represents a revision of a currently offered class as I would like to teach it.)
Printable Version of the Syllabus (Adobe Reader needed to view paper)


Monday,
Wednesday, and Friday 4:40 PM, 22 Deike
Review Sessions
Wednesdays 5:30PM, 2 Deike
| Instructor: | Jennifer Nemitz Department of Geosciences 438 Deike Building Office Phone: Email: jaring@geosc.psu.edu Office Hours: 3:00-4:30 PM W or anytime by appointment |
TA: | John Doe Department of Geosciences Deike Building Office Phone: Email: Office Hours: |
![]()
GEOSC 452 Introduction to Hydrogeology at Penn
State is the longest running, continuously offered hydrology class in the
Western Hemisphere. The main focus of the course is how water moves
through and interacts with soils and rocks. Topics covered include:
the hydrologic cycle; occurrence, movement, quality, and quantity of
groundwater; quantitative geologic and hydrologic methods; and the role of water
in geologic processes. This course has one or more required field trips for
which a fee is charged to the student. Prerequisite:
CHEM 013
;
GEOSC 001 ,
GEOSC 020 , or
GEOSC 071; and fifth-semester standing.
Course format will usually consist of lectures on Monday and Wednesday with
Friday reserved for case studies and the two midterms.
![]()
The goal of this course is for students to develop a method to break down and solve real-world, often complex, hydrogeological problems and communicate the results to a diverse audience as they would need to do in a professional setting.
![]()
|
|
|
|
Applied Hydrogeology,
4th Edition
(2001), C.W. Fetter (Please make sure your copy includes the CD in the
back of the book if you are buying a used copy). |
| Fieldtrip Guidebook, REQUIRED xeroxed packet available at the Penn State Bookstore containing figures, maps, descriptions, etc. about the fieldtrip | |
|
Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology, 2nd Edition (1997), P.A. Dominico and F.W. Schwartz (this text will be held on reserve behind the desk in the Earth and Mineral Sciences Library, 1st Floor of Deike for 2 hour loans) |
|
Protractor, compass, and scientific calculator |

|
Date TBA, but Midterm 1 will occur around mid October. Test format could include multiple choice, short answer, and problems. The instructor will hold an optional evening review session prior to the midterm. |
|
Date TBA, but Midterm 2 will occur around mid November. Test format could include multiple choice, short answer, and problems. The instructor will hold an optional evening review session prior to the midterm. |
|
Case study day will be every Friday (except for midterm test days and the first Friday of the semester). Students will be given a case study based upon the topics covered in the previous lectures and textbook readings. The students will be assigned to groups that they will be in for the remainder of the semester to work on the case studies. The case study grade will be based as follows: 10% group grade for leading a case study discussion and 10% group grade for the final case study presentation. Please see the Case Study Policy section below for more information. |
|
Your journal will be comprised of four components: lecture concept mapping (5%), the fieldtrip assignment (5%), homework problems (25%) and case study reflections (10%). Each student will be assigned to concept map three different lectures. The student will make two copies of each concept map assignment, one to include in the journal and one for the instructor to post to Angel. All of the concept maps will be available on Angel for everyone to use for studying. We will go over concept mapping during the first few lectures. The fieldtrip assignment will be described later and will be included in your personal journal. Please see the Homework Policy Section for more details on the homeworks. Please see the Case Study Policy section for more details on the case study reflections. |
|
A full-day fieldtrip focusing on the hydrogeology of the State College area is required (to be scheduled on a weekend at the class's convenience). Depending on class size, two identical fieldtrips may be offered to reduce group size and reduce scheduling conflicts. The trip will depart at 8:00 AM from Deike Building and return no later than 5:30 PM. A stop at a fast food restaurant will be made for lunch or students may pack a brown bag lunch. Non-Geological Science and Earth Science undergraduate major accounts will be charged for the cost of the trip. Also, the student activity fees of all other participants will be charged for the cost of the trip. The Fieldtrip Guidebook is required for the field trip. Each student will be required to complete an individual assignment (to be described later) concerning the fieldtrip and include it in their personal journal. A virtual fieldtrip will be available for students with disabilities or students who are unable to attend the fieldtrip and have made arrangements with the instructor before the fieldtrip. |
|
|
|
|
Homework problems will be assigned throughout the semester and are to be included in your journal. For some of the homework exercises, you will be provided with the answer and must correct your own work in the journal. We will go over self-correction in detail when the first homework problems are assigned. Some of the homework exercises will be collected and graded by the TA. |
|
As upper level students, I expect the homework to look professional. Please make sure that your work is neat and all your calculations / handwriting are readable. All graphs and tables must be done using a graphing program such as Excel. No "hand sketches" will be accepted. All answers should be circled in red. |
|
An optional
homework review / help session will be conducted by the TA every Wednesday
immediately after class from 5:30-7:00 PM in room 2 Deike. The review
sessions are a chance for you to ask any questions and to work with your
classmates on the homework. You are strongly encouraged to attend the
homework review sessions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The case study portion of the class will account for 20% of the final course grade and will be broken down as follows: 10% group grade for leading a case study discussion of a case study provided to the class by the instructor and 10% group grade for a 15 minute presentation of a case study of the group's choosing (case study must be approved by instructor in advance). The 15 minute group presentation will be in lieu of a final and will occur during the regularly scheduled final period. |
|
For the first few case study sessions, I will lead the discussion on the chosen case study. You will be provided with the case study on Wednesday's lecture along with guided questions about the case study. On Friday, you will meet with your assigned group and discuss the case study as well as the guided questions. We will then regroup and discuss the important points. As we become more familiar and comfortable with the case study discussions, each group will be required to lead a case study discussion. The assigned group will receive their case study on Monday and must write guided questions for the rest of the class, who will receive them on Wednesday as normal. Each group can receive a maximum of 10% of their course grade for leading their assigned discussion. We will go over what is expected of the discussion leaders as we work our way through the first initial cases. All group members will receive the same grade according to the Case Study Rubric that we will develop as a class. |
|
Each group will give a 15 minute power-point presentation followed by a 5 minute question and answer period on a case study of their choosing (approved by the instructor in advance). The presentation will be worth a maximum of 10% of the course grade and will be presented during our final exam period in lieu of a final exam. All group members will receive the same grade for the presentation according to the Group Presentation Rubric presented at the end of this syllabus. |
|
Each student will keep a personal journal in which they will post their case study reflections. For each case study, the reflections should include the answers to the guided questions, a summary of your groups discussion, a summary of the class discussion, and any other personal thoughts you would like to include about the case study. As long as the reflections are complete and insightful, they will receive full credit (this is a give-away here as I want to assess your critical thinking.) The reflections are worth 5% of the total course grade with the possibility of extra credit for reflections that "wow" me. |

Make-up exams will be administered if a student misses a midterm for a university approved excuse. If you are sick, out of town, etc, you must contact the instructor in person or via email ahead of time or as soon as possible if early contact is not possible. The instructor reserves the right to provide a different exam for the makeup. The questions and format may be different, but the material covered will be the same. You will find that I am very understanding as long as you communicate with me.
![]()
| Letter Grade | Cumulative Percentage |
| A | 93% and above |
| A- |
90% - 92% |
| B+ | 87% - 89% |
| B | 83% - 86% |
| B- | 80% - 82% |
| C+ | 75% - 79% |
| C | 70% - 75% |
| D | 60% - 69% |
| F | < 60% |

Definition and expectations: Academic integrity is the pursuit of scholarly activity in an open, honest and responsible manner. Academic integrity is a basic guiding principle for all academic activity at The Pennsylvania State University, and all members of the University community are expected to act in accordance with this principle. Consistent with this expectation, the University's Code of Conduct states that all students should act with personal integrity, respect other students' dignity, rights and property, and help create and maintain an environment in which all can succeed through the fruits of their efforts.
Academic integrity includes a commitment not to engage in or tolerate acts of falsification, misrepresentation or deception. Such acts of dishonesty violate the fundamental ethical principles of the University community and compromise the worth of work completed by others.
In this class, students are encouraged to discuss methods for solving homework problems but must turn in their own independent work. Independent work is defined as doing your own graphs, calculations, reasoning, etc. The student is responsible for knowing the meaning of independent work. If you have questions or are uncertain about the meaning of independent work, please consult your instructor. Identical papers will not be regarded as independent work. All instances of academic integrity violations will be pursued according to university policy.
As a general rule of thumb, collaborative work stops as soon as pencil or pen touches paper and fingers touch the keyboard or mouse.
| CASE STUDY GROUP PRESENTATION RUBRIC | |||||
| Objectives | Low Performance | At or Below Average | At or Above Average | Exemplary Performance | Earned Points |
| Explanation | 0
points Explanation is unclear. |
3
point Explanation has moments of clarity with some gaps in logic. |
4 points Good solid response with clear explanation. |
5 points Complete response with a detailed explanation. |
|
| Use of Visuals (PowerPoint Presentation) |
0 points Missing, inappropriate or unclear diagram and figures. Slides do not flow from one to the next and/or are not in a logical order. |
3 points Appropriate diagram or figures missing critical details. Slide flow can be awkward at times and/or some slides are difficult to read. |
4 points Clear diagrams and figures presented with some detail. Slides flow in a logical order and slides are fairly easy to read. |
5 points Clear diagram and figures with complete details. Easy to read, professional visual presentation. |
|
| Accuracy |
0 points Less than 50% of the presentation is correct. |
3 points Between 50-75% of the presentation is correct. |
4 points Between 75-90% of the presentation is correct. |
5 points No errors. |
|
| Demonstrated Knowledge of Chosen Case Study |
0 points Response shows no understanding of the problem. |
3 points Response shows some understanding of the problem. |
4 points Response shows understanding of the problem, ideas, and procedure. |
5 points Response shows complete understanding of the problem, ideas, and procedure. |
|
| Response to Questions |
0
points Group was not able to answer questions. |
3
points Group was able to answer some questions but could not provide in-depth answers. |
4
points Group was able to answers most question with in-depth answers |
5
points Group provided thoughtful, in-depth, and correct answers to all questions. |
|
| Group Dynamics: |
0 points Presentation was monopolized by one group member. |
3
points Most group members played an equal part in the presentation, but the question session was monopolized by one group member. |
4
points Most group members played an equal part in the presentation and question session. |
5
points Each group members played an equal part in the presentation and question session. |
|
| Score out of 30: | |||||